[ RECRUITMENT_TECHNOLOGY ]

AI Video Interview Platform

2026Learning, Hiring & HRIn-depth

What it is

Asynchronous video interviews at scale, with AI assessment and its own billing.

Client work is shown without identifying imagery

[ THE_PROBLEM ]

Why this existed

First-round screening is the most repetitive part of hiring. Coordinating calendars for hundreds of applicants costs more than the screening is worth, and candidates get inconsistent questions.

[ WHAT_WE_BUILT ]

What we built

Interviewers define job profiles with role-specific questions plus a reusable intro question bank; each profile produces a shareable link. Candidates record one response per question in sequence, with chunked upload and playback so a dropped connection does not lose the interview. Interviewers get a dashboard, per-interview detail and review. Around it: role-separated dashboards for admins, interviewers and candidates, a metered billing system with a webhook and scheduled jobs, password management, and a full in-app documentation set covering getting started, best practices, troubleshooting and FAQ for both sides.

Job profiles with role-specific questions and a reusable intro question bank
Shareable interview link per profile
Sequential candidate recording, one response per question
Chunked upload and playback so a dropped connection does not lose the interview
Interviewer dashboard with per-interview detail and review
Role-separated surfaces for admins, interviewers and candidates
Metered billing with webhook handling and scheduled jobs
Password management
In-app documentation for both sides covering setup, best practice and troubleshooting

[ HOW_IT_IS_USED ]

How a company uses it

A company screening hundreds of applicants replaces the first-round phone call entirely — every candidate answers the same questions, hiring managers review on their own schedule, and nobody coordinates calendars.

Built with

ConvexReactViteChunked video upload

[ COMMON_QUESTIONS ]

Questions clients ask

Why is chunked video upload called out?

Because candidates record on phones and home connections, and a single failed upload at the end of a fifteen-minute interview loses the whole thing. Chunking makes a network blip recoverable instead of fatal — it is the difference between a platform candidates complete and one they abandon.

Is asynchronous interviewing fair to candidates?

It has genuine trade-offs. It removes scheduling friction and gives everyone identical questions, which is fairer than an interviewer improvising differently each time. It also removes the chance to ask a follow-up, and it disadvantages people without a quiet space or a decent connection. Worth being deliberate about where in the funnel it sits.

Why ship documentation as part of the product?

Because both sides are non-technical and often using it once. A candidate confused by the recording flow does not open a support ticket, they abandon the application — and you never learn why.

[ RELATED_WORK ]